Hitched to the Old Testament

Should followers of Jesus “unhitch from the Old Testament” or do we still need that part of God’s Word? Recently, Andy Stanley preached on the need to “unhitch from the Old Testament” and it’s amazing how quickly information can fly through social media. Everyone seems to think that Andy was somehow ready to cut the Old Testament out of our Bibles. But, let’s be clear. Andy Stanley believes in the full inspiration of the Old Testament. Moreover, his motive for his message was good. He was trying to help certain people, who having grown up with faith in Jesus and then having learned about the Old Testament, find it troubling to their faith. He was saying that their faith was in Jesus and they were to be guided by the New Testament, not the Old Testament laws. Nevertheless, despite Andy’s good intentions, I think there is a better way to look at this issue. So here are some reasons we still need the Old Testament (or as I like to call it, the Hebrew Bible).

We need the the Hebrew Bible to understand the New Testament. Everything we read in the New Testament is based on the Old. The New Testament quotes the Old Testament over 900 times. It bases so many of our life principles on the Old Testament. For example, Paul points out in Romans 4 that we get the principle of justification by faith from Genesis 15:6, where it says that Abraham believed God and it was reckoned to him for righteousness. Should we pay our pastors for teaching and shepherding us? Yes, in 1 Timothy 5:18, Paul quotes Deuteronomy 25:4, about not muzzling an ox, to make the case for paying your pastor. Try studying Jesus’ words in the Sermon on the Mount without grasping the meaning of the Law of Moses. The Lord intensifies each of the commands to relate to our motives and intentions; not merely our actions. One last example: The New Testament prohibits immorality (1 Thess 4:13) but doesn’t specify what constitutes immorality. So for example, there is no specific New Testament prohibition of incest. Does that mean that the New Testament approves of incest? Of course not. Anyone who has read Leviticus 20 would know that incest is considered highly immoral and so the New Testament prohibition of immorality includes incest. Without the Old Testament, the New Testament would become meaningless.

We also need the Hebrew Bible to understand the holiness of God. Too often we dismiss Leviticus, which details how Israel was to approach their holy God, with a “that was then, but this is now” attitude. But by revealing how separate the God of Israel was from sin, we can begin to appreciate what Lord Jesus has done for us as our Great High Priest. The holy God has not changed; rather the Lord Jesus has pioneered a new way for us to approach God with His holiness representing us. That’s why, with Jesus as our High Priest, we can “draw near with confidence to the throne of grace” (Heb 4:14-16).

Furthermore, we need the Hebrew Bible to understand that Jesus is the promised Messiah. It was through someone sharing the many predictions of the Messiah in the Hebrew Bible, that I, and countless others, came to faith in Him. Some examples are Micah 5:2 about Jesus’ birth in Bethlehem, and Isaiah 9:6 about Messiah being the unique God-Man, and Isaiah 53, about Messiah being our sacrificial substitute for sin. Take a look at the book of Acts. There are two great truths that are used to proclaim Jesus. One of them is the resurrection of Jesus from the dead. Andy Stanley is correct when he argues that is the essential basis of our faith. But the second great argument used in the book of Acts, is that Jesus is the Messiah because He fulfilled the predictions of the Hebrew Bible. That’s why Peter bases his first sermon in Acts on Jesus as the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy (see Acts 2:22-36), and in the middle of Acts, he says of Jesus the Messiah, “of Him all the prophets bear witness” (Acts 10:43). And the book of Acts ends with Paul persuading people “concerning Jesus from both the Law of Moses and the Prophets” (Acts 28:23). The apostles proclaimed faith in Jesus on the basis of the Old Testament.

Another reason we need the Hebrew Bible is so that we can live according to the wisdom of God. In Deuteronomy 4:6, Moses tells Israel, “Carefully follow them (i.e. the commandments), for this will show your wisdom and understanding in the eyes of the peoples. When they hear about all these statutes, they will say, ‘This great nation is indeed a wise and understanding people.” I agree with Andy Stanley, that there are laws that have been adjusted by the New Covenant law of Messiah. When we sin, we don’t bring a sheep or a goat to the altar for forgiveness. But God gave to be divine wisdom. And there is an underlying wisdom principle in each commandment. If we discern what it is and live by it, we’ll be wise in our walk with God. Here’s an example: the command to keep the Sabbath is not repeated in the New Testament. But, if we’re wise, we’ll take a day (and according to Romans 14 we can choose whichever day we wish) and use it for physical rest and spiritual renewal. That’s not a New Testament command but an Old Testament wisdom principle.

Not too long ago I was at a conference and encountered Walter Kaiser, the great Old Testament scholar. I told him I was looking forward to his session but I was surprised that he was speaking on the New Testament. He replied, “I love the New Testament—it reminds me so much of the Old.” His words capture the reason that New Testament followers of Jesus need to remain hitched to both testaments, Old and New,  because “all Scripture is inspired by God” (2 Timothy 3:16) and we need all of it to “be complete, equipped for every good work” (2 Timothy 3:17).


  • Avatar Paul says:

    Great points Michael and I’m sure Andy would agree with you.

  • Avatar Martha Hidalgo says:

    That was so beautifully addressed Dr. Rydelnik – both my husband and I knew Andy’s statement was not the best way to make his point.
    Your gracious words should dispel the negativity that has been buzzing around social media. People unfortunately seems to jump to conclusions which is terribly misleading and quite frankly unbiblical.

    Thank you

  • Avatar Faith Luttrell says:

    Thank you, Michael! I love your explanations to what could be controversial questions or misunderstandings.

  • Avatar Adele Rosenthal says:

    Thank you so very much for this very clear explanation. May the L-rd bless you and keep you. May His countenance continue to shine upon you and bless you.

  • Avatar Steve Robbins says:

    Thanks for this article. Too many people and pastors ignore the Hebrew Bible but I think it is very important. I just finished a book, “Waiting on God” by Wayne Stiles that used the story of Joseph to explain his thoughts. And yesterday, our Pastor used the story of Gideon to explain about getting rid our our personal idols so we could get closer to God.

    Thanks again!

  • Avatar Beth Hanna says:

    Thank you, Michael! I of course always believed it, but you teach it in such a succinct, clear way! I definitely will “save” this blog! “Saludos,” as we say in Español!

    • Avatar Dr. Michael Rydelnik says:

      Thank you, Beth. Eva and I think of you often and would love to see you when you visit Chicago!

  • Your words about the Old Testament are so sweet and true. Thank you for reminding people of this truth. My concern for your defense of Andy’s sermon is because Andy actually wasn’t saying these things of which you so clearly define. If Andy still believes these things, which I hope in all earnest that he does, then he needs to go back and redo some of the incorrect statements he made. It appears that he is sliding down the same slippery slope that Rob Bell and Brian McLaren disappeared down, and they were at one time strong theologians. Andy seems to be taking that same extreme dispensationalism theological approach that divides the Bible into parts, and then goes on to explain that those other parts are relevant any more.

    • Avatar Dr. Michael Rydelnik says:

      Andy is not heading down the path of those you mention. Also, I am dispensational, and obviously value the Hebrew Bible, so I don’t think that’s Andy’s issue.

Leave a Reply